I've just helped judge a journalism contest for my alma mater, McClatchy, and have a couple of observations to report:
First, don't believe those who argue that newspapers' investigative reporting is so minimal that it's easily replaced. It isn't small, and if newspapers couldn't do it anymore, the void would be very deep. Second, high-quality watchdog reporting isn't simply the province of big national players doing "secret prisons" or "secret eavesdropping" stories. It's also the heart and soul of newsrooms across the country that keep watch over their communities and regions.
I say these things not primarily to brag about the work of my former colleagues -- though I'm honored to do so. I say it because the experience of reading this work of 29 McClatchy papers (covering the last half of 2008) was so at odds with the critiques I often read about newspapers today.
Recent Comments